- This topic has 12 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
10th January 2018 at 11:46 #11183
This is a thread that I’ve split from another discussion Topic
-
10th January 2018 at 11:46 #11043Anonymous
Mine was built 24/11/1983 but not registered until 1986, and was subject to a factory conversion from LHD to RHD, which was due to lack of sales of this model in the US.
-
10th January 2018 at 17:31 #11047
-
-
10th January 2018 at 19:02 #11051
-
13th January 2018 at 08:45 #11156
Did something happen that caused Jaguar to abandon the plan to send the cars to the US?
-
13th January 2018 at 11:04 #11159
Yes Alex The US did not want them, like me they wanted the V12.
-
-
13th January 2018 at 12:56 #11164Anonymous
The cabriolet was a compromise as Jaguar thought the US legislation would toughen up on full convertables. This did not happen so without this doubt I feel sure the cabriolet model would not exist, as the Americans prefer a full open top car together with the V12 option.
-
13th January 2018 at 17:24 #11167
-
-
13th January 2018 at 19:46 #11170Anonymous
Hi,
The sales are a result of the unknown legislation. My view is the convertables would have been introduced earlier, and in my opinion the cabriolet would not exist. I personally prefer my cabriolet with a solid 3.6 engine that does not overheat, that has a manual gearbox that gives you a better driving experience than the V12 automatic variant. This vehicle gives enough speed and comfort that I need.
like you I look at the sales of these cars and I am aware of the figures you have produced. For me the situation is perfect and this is my option of the situation.
-
14th January 2018 at 14:45 #11212
You wrote
I am aware of the figures you have produced. —
Well I doubt it very much as there is no other list other than this one I created from My Data Base. The figures are not even listed at JDHT.
-
-
14th January 2018 at 10:05 #11194
Hi Alan Tew @cabriolet
I think your view is quite credible – after all the early pre-Jaguar XJ-S Soft Top bodyshop conversions were to create full Convertibles rather than a Targa Topped Cabriolet.
I’ve both Convertibles and Cabriolets and they are very different experiences, and there might have been merit in having both models if they’d been designed from the ground up at the same time. Then the Sales folk could have directed purchasers towards the most suitable Soft Top for their needs and location – with our UK weather the Cabriolet does work well 🙂 and the full Convertible works well in the southern US.
I do like driving my V12 Automatic Convertible, but do wonder what a V12 Manual would be like – especially in the Cabriolet. That for me (until proven otherwise by actually driving one) would be the best combination.
Anyway, just thoughts and opinions shared.
Laurence
-
14th January 2018 at 15:36 #11214Anonymous
Chill out John, your figures are there for members to read and it is good that you have taken the time to break them down to individual countries. I will try and keep my points in a brief way now so that I do not upset anyone.
-
14th January 2018 at 16:51 #11216Anonymous
Hi Laurence,
i suspect there was not the investment to do 2 models anyway, especially in the crossover from BL to Ford. I think if they introduced a full convertible in the earlier days it would have boosted sales enormously. As you say the cabriolet does suit our weather as different panels can be easily removed. When travelling to classic car shows I just remove the targa panels only, and then the rest when I get there. My seal for the targa panels is good, but I have placed an order with you for use in the future. You have to take the opportunity to get one if you hope to own the vehicle long term.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.